ADVERTISEMENT
The 15 U.S. Cities on the Potential Target List
The following cities have been identified by nuclear experts as places that could be targeted in a large‑scale, global conflict. While it’s crucial to remember this is hypothetical analysis, the reasoning behind it is rooted in military strategy and historical precedent.
At first glance, this small Montana city — with just over 60,000 residents — seems an unlikely candidate. However, its proximity to Malmstrom Air Force Base, which oversees hundreds of Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), gives it strategic significance. Destroying U.S. ICBM capabilities could diminish the ability to retaliate in a nuclear exchange.
2. Cheyenne, Wyoming
Similarly small, Cheyenne is home to Francis E. Warren Air Force Base — a critical command center for nuclear missile operations. Even though it’s remote, a strike here could undercut nuclear command and control.
3. Ogden & Clearfield, Utah
These neighboring cities might not be household names, but they sit near Hill Air Force Base, another important site tied to U.S. nuclear operations. Combined, their population is over 120,000 — yet their inclusion on this list is due to nearby military infrastructure, not their size.
4. Shreveport, Louisiana
Shreveport is most notable for its proximity to Barksdale Air Force Base, which hosts B‑52 bombers capable of delivering nuclear weapons. Its strategic role makes it a logical target if an adversary aims to cripple U.S. long‑range strike capabilities.
5. Honolulu, Hawaii
6. Omaha, Nebraska
Omaha doesn’t carry the obvious geopolitical weight of Washington, D.C., but Offutt Air Force Base lies just outside the city. This base has historically been central to U.S. strategic command and nuclear defense.
7. Colorado Springs, Colorado
Colorado Springs is home to NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command), which monitors and defends U.S. and Canadian airspace. A strike here would aim to blind early warning systems and degrade defensive capabilities.
8. Albuquerque, New Mexico
The city’s mention stems from Kirtland Air Force Base, which houses one of the largest U.S. nuclear arsenals. Albuquerque’s population and military connections make it a high‑value target.
9. Washington, D.C.
10. Seattle, Washington
Seattle’s location near Naval Base Kitsap — home to submarines and strategic weapons — combined with its role as a major tech hub and seaport, increases its strategic vulnerability. Its geography also poses evacuation challenges, with water and mountains bordering the city.
11. San Francisco, California
San Francisco doesn’t host major nuclear bases, but its symbolic importance as a financial and cultural center, along with its global economic ties, make it a high‑impact target in broader strategic calculations.
12. Houston, Texas
With a population surpassing 2 million, Houston is a major economic engine — especially for energy and aerospace sectors. Its size alone would qualify it as a secondary, yet significant, target.
13. Chicago, Illinois
Chicago’s inclusion reflects its role as a transportation hub, population center, and economic powerhouse. The region’s infrastructure and industry make it a consequential strategic target.
14. Los Angeles, California
Home to Hollywood and a vast metropolitan population, Los Angeles represents cultural influence and economic might. Its port facilities and industry further amplify its strategic importance.
15. New York City, New York
The largest city in the United States, New York is the financial heart not just of the nation but arguably much of the world. Its symbolic value, population density, and global influence make it the ultimate bullseye in nuclear targeting discussions.
What This List Really Tells Us
It’s easy to read a list like this and react with fear or disbelief. But looking deeper reveals several key insights:
1. Nuclear strategy isn’t random.
Attack planning focuses on disabling retaliation, command systems, and defensive infrastructure — not simply hitting large cities.
2. Smaller towns can be strategically critical.
Places like Great Falls and Cheyenne remind us that not all military significance is obvious from afar.
3. Symbolism matters.
Even cities without direct military assets appear because their cultural, economic, or political weight would amplify the psychological and global impact of an attack.
4. Peace and diplomacy remain paramount.
These hypothetical analyses highlight the devastation that full‑scale war could bring, underscoring why nuclear arms control, de‑escalation, and robust diplomacy continue to be global priorities.
Beyond the Blast: Human and Environmental Cost
While this post focuses on which U.S. cities could be targeted first, it’s important not to gloss over the impact. A nuclear strike doesn’t just destroy infrastructure — it obliterates communities, creates long‑lasting radiation effects, and triggers global economic and social upheaval. Studies and simulations consistently show that even cities not directly hit could suffer fallout, supply chain collapse, and long‑term public health crises.
This sobering reality reminds us why leaders, analysts, and citizens alike grapple with the terrifying implications of modern warfare. Even in worst‑case planning scenarios, the hope remains that such an event never unfolds.
Conclusion: A Chilling Hypothesis, But a Call to Action
The idea of a third world war, particularly one involving nuclear weapons, is chilling. The list of 15 U.S. cities experts say could be targeted includes obvious strategic hubs like Washington, D.C. and surprising entries like Great Falls, Montana. Whether tied to military infrastructure or symbolic value, each city tells a piece of a larger puzzle about how modern conflict might unfold.
Yet this list isn’t a prophecy — it’s a reminder of the stakes involved in global diplomacy, alliance building, and strategic restraint. As tensions evolve around the world, understanding potential outcomes helps inform public discourse, policy decisions, and, ultimately, efforts to prevent such catastrophic conflict from ever becoming reality.
ADVERTISEMENT
